Most patent licenses state in the agreement that one or more of the following licences are paid by the taker: a pre-licensing fee (i.e. the prepayment mentioned above), a continuous lump sum payment of royalties and/or rolling charges. In certain circumstances, the inventor would have to license without a licence, z.B if he receives another benefit. For example, the inventor may also provide research services for a fee. Patent licensing sets are described in a patent licensing agreement signed by both parties. This clarifies the terms of the license and specifies where, how and when the licensee can use the patent. In the debate on the licensing of intellectual property, the concepts of evaluation and evaluation must be understood in their strict terms. Evaluation is the process of evaluating a licence against the specific metrics of a given negotiation, which may include its circumstances, the geographical distribution of the rights granted, the product range, the width of the market, the competitiveness of the taker, the growth prospects, etc. The synchronization fee will be due to the composer/songwriter or his publisher. They are strictly contractual and vary greatly in quantity, depending on the subjective importance of the music, the type of production and the media used. The royalties to be paid are those of mutual acceptance, but they depend on industry practice. Although this method is widespread, the main challenge is to have access to data on comparable technologies and the terms of the agreements they contain.
Fortunately, there are several people recognized [by whom?] Organizations (see “Royalty Rate sites” at the end of this article) that have complete information on the two royalty rates and the main terms of the agreements to which they belong. There are also IP-related organizations, such as the Licensing Executives Society, that allow its members to access and share data collected for private purposes. The licensee`s share of income is generally determined by the basic rule of 25%, which would even be used by tax authorities in the United States and Europe for long-standing transactions. The action is spun on the operating income of the license company. Even where such a division is controversial, the rule may still be the starting point for negotiations. Mechanical royalties for music produced outside the United States are being negotiated – there is no compulsory license – and royalty payments to the composer and her publisher for recordings are based on the wholesale, retail or “recommended” value of the CDs marketed. A licence is an agreement between two parties for the use of a person`s property without paying money, while royalties pay an agreed fee each time they use the owners` property. The license is essentially the right to use something that belongs to another person, the licensee grants the licensee the authorization under the licensing agreement, while the royalties are the payments for that use. Companies in developing countries are often invited by the provider of expertise or patent license to consider technical services (TS) and technical assistance (TA) as part of the technology transfer process and to pay them “royalties”.
TS and TA are linked to the IP (intellectual property) transmitted – and sometimes dependent on its acquisition – but they are not IP.  TA and TS may also be the only part of the transfer or transfer of the investigation period, their simultaneous supplier.